↓ Skip to main content

Elucidation of Pathways Driving Asthma Pathogenesis: Development of a Systems-Level Analytic Strategy

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in immunology, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Elucidation of Pathways Driving Asthma Pathogenesis: Development of a Systems-Level Analytic Strategy
Published in
Frontiers in immunology, September 2014
DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2014.00447
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael L. Walker, Kathryn E. Holt, Gary P. Anderson, Shu Mei Teo, Peter D. Sly, Patrick G. Holt, Michael Inouye

Abstract

Asthma is a genetically complex, chronic lung disease defined clinically as episodic airflow limitation and breathlessness that is at least partially reversible, either spontaneously or in response to therapy. Whereas asthma was rare in the late 1800s and early 1900s, the marked increase in its incidence and prevalence since the 1960s points to substantial gene × environment interactions occurring over a period of years, but these interactions are very poorly understood (1-6). It is widely believed that the majority of asthma begins during childhood and manifests first as intermittent wheeze. However, wheeze is also very common in infancy and only a subset of wheezy children progress to persistent asthma for reasons that are largely obscure. Here, we review the current literature regarding causal pathways leading to early asthma development and chronicity. Given the complex interactions of many risk factors over time eventually leading to apparently multiple asthma phenotypes, we suggest that deeply phenotyped cohort studies combined with sophisticated network models will be required to derive the next generation of biological and clinical insights in asthma pathogenesis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 79 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 21%
Student > Master 14 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 11%
Student > Bachelor 6 7%
Student > Postgraduate 6 7%
Other 11 14%
Unknown 18 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 14%
Environmental Science 4 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 4%
Psychology 3 4%
Other 19 23%
Unknown 20 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 January 2015.
All research outputs
#15,168,964
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#14,207
of 31,513 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#131,560
of 263,029 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#77
of 176 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,513 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,029 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 176 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.