↓ Skip to main content

The Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor Meets Immunology: Friend or Foe? A Little of Both

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in immunology, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
96 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
163 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor Meets Immunology: Friend or Foe? A Little of Both
Published in
Frontiers in immunology, October 2014
DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2014.00458
Pubmed ID
Authors

Walker Julliard, John H. Fechner, Joshua D. Mezrich

Abstract

The aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR) has long been studied by toxicologists as a ligand-activated transcription factor that is activated by dioxin and other environmental pollutants such as polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). The hallmark of AHR activation is the upregulation of the cytochrome P450 enzymes that metabolize many of these toxic compounds. However, recent findings demonstrate that both exogenous and endogenous AHR ligands can alter innate and adaptive immune responses including effects on T-cell differentiation. Kynurenine, a tryptophan breakdown product, is one such endogenous ligand of the AHR. Expression of indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase by dendritic cells causes accumulation of kynurenine and results in subsequent tolerogenic effects including increased regulatory T-cell activity. At the same time, PAHs found in pollution enhance Th17 differentiation in the lungs of exposed mice via the AHR. In this perspective, we will discuss the importance of the AHR in the immune system and the role this might play in normal physiology and response to disease.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 163 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
France 2 1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 154 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 38 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 22%
Student > Master 20 12%
Student > Bachelor 12 7%
Professor 8 5%
Other 32 20%
Unknown 17 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 58 36%
Medicine and Dentistry 24 15%
Immunology and Microbiology 20 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 11%
Chemistry 7 4%
Other 14 9%
Unknown 22 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 October 2014.
All research outputs
#15,740,505
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#15,377
of 31,520 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#139,131
of 265,594 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#79
of 173 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,520 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,594 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 173 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.