↓ Skip to main content

Cellular Plasticity of CD4+ T Cells in the Intestine

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in immunology, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
47 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
166 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cellular Plasticity of CD4+ T Cells in the Intestine
Published in
Frontiers in immunology, October 2014
DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2014.00488
Pubmed ID
Authors

Verena Brucklacher-Waldert, Edward J. Carr, Michelle A. Linterman, Marc Veldhoen

Abstract

Barrier sites such as the gastrointestinal tract are in constant contact with the environment, which contains both beneficial and harmful components. The immune system at the epithelia must make the distinction between these components to balance tolerance, protection, and immunopathology. This is achieved via multifaceted immune recognition, highly organized lymphoid structures, and the interaction of many types of immune cells. The adaptive immune response in the gut is orchestrated by CD4(+) helper T (Th) cells, which are integral to gut immunity. In recent years, it has become apparent that the functional identity of these Th cells is not as fixed as initially thought. Plasticity in differentiated T cell subsets has now been firmly established, in both health and disease. The gut, in particular, utilizes CD4(+) T cell plasticity to mold CD4(+) T cell phenotypes to maintain its finely poised balance of tolerance and inflammation and to encourage biodiversity within the enteric microbiome. In this review, we will discuss intestinal helper T cell plasticity and our current understanding of its mechanisms, including our growing knowledge of an evolutionarily ancient symbiosis between microbiota and malleable CD4(+) T cell effectors.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 166 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 2 1%
United States 2 1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Unknown 160 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 39 23%
Researcher 36 22%
Student > Master 30 18%
Student > Bachelor 13 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 4%
Other 23 14%
Unknown 18 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 56 34%
Immunology and Microbiology 41 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 20 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 1%
Other 7 4%
Unknown 24 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 October 2014.
All research outputs
#19,962,154
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#22,598
of 31,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#184,640
of 267,713 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#119
of 181 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,713 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 181 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.