↓ Skip to main content

Metabolism via Arginase or Nitric Oxide Synthase: Two Competing Arginine Pathways in Macrophages

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in immunology, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
patent
3 patents
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
video
1 YouTube creator

Readers on

mendeley
1029 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Metabolism via Arginase or Nitric Oxide Synthase: Two Competing Arginine Pathways in Macrophages
Published in
Frontiers in immunology, October 2014
DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2014.00532
Pubmed ID
Authors

Meera Rath, Ingrid Müller, Pascale Kropf, Ellen I. Closs, Markus Munder

Abstract

Macrophages play a major role in the immune system, both as antimicrobial effector cells and as immunoregulatory cells, which induce, suppress or modulate adaptive immune responses. These key aspects of macrophage biology are fundamentally driven by the phenotype of macrophage arginine metabolism that is prevalent in an evolving or ongoing immune response. M1 macrophages express the enzyme nitric oxide synthase, which metabolizes arginine to nitric oxide (NO) and citrulline. NO can be metabolized to further downstream reactive nitrogen species, while citrulline might be reused for efficient NO synthesis via the citrulline-NO cycle. M2 macrophages are characterized by expression of the enzyme arginase, which hydrolyzes arginine to ornithine and urea. The arginase pathway limits arginine availability for NO synthesis and ornithine itself can further feed into the important downstream pathways of polyamine and proline syntheses, which are important for cellular proliferation and tissue repair. M1 versus M2 polarization leads to opposing outcomes of inflammatory reactions, but depending on the context, M1 and M2 macrophages can be both pro- and anti-inflammatory. Notably, M1/M2 macrophage polarization can be driven by microbial infection or innate danger signals without any influence of adaptive immune cells, secondarily driving the T helper (Th)1/Th2 polarization of the evolving adaptive immune response. Since both arginine metabolic pathways cross-inhibit each other on the level of the respective arginine break-down products and Th1 and Th2 lymphocytes can drive or amplify macrophage M1/M2 dichotomy via cytokine activation, this forms the basis of a self-sustaining M1/M2 polarization of the whole immune response. Understanding the arginine metabolism of M1/M2 macrophage phenotypes is therefore central to find new possibilities to manipulate immune responses in infection, autoimmune diseases, chronic inflammatory conditions, and cancer.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,029 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Taiwan 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 1018 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 210 20%
Student > Master 155 15%
Student > Bachelor 151 15%
Researcher 100 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 62 6%
Other 111 11%
Unknown 240 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 221 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 160 16%
Immunology and Microbiology 124 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 97 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 33 3%
Other 119 12%
Unknown 275 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 February 2023.
All research outputs
#4,782,199
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#5,219
of 31,698 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,249
of 273,722 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#35
of 187 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,698 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 273,722 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 187 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.