↓ Skip to main content

Mast Cell Mediators: Their Differential Release and the Secretory Pathways Involved

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in immunology, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
9 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
7 Wikipedia pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Readers on

mendeley
392 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mast Cell Mediators: Their Differential Release and the Secretory Pathways Involved
Published in
Frontiers in immunology, November 2014
DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2014.00569
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tae Chul Moon, A. Dean Befus, Marianna Kulka

Abstract

Mast cells (MC) are widely distributed throughout the body and are common at mucosal surfaces, a major host-environment interface. MC are functionally and phenotypically heterogeneous depending on the microenvironment in which they mature. Although MC have been classically viewed as effector cells of IgE-mediated allergic diseases, they are also recognized as important in host defense, innate and acquired immunity, homeostatic responses, and immunoregulation. MC activation can induce release of pre-formed mediators such as histamine from their granules, as well as release of de novo synthesized lipid mediators, cytokines, and chemokines that play diverse roles, not only in allergic reactions but also in numerous physiological and pathophysiological responses. Indeed, MC release their mediators in a discriminating and chronological manner, depending upon the stimuli involved and their signaling cascades (e.g., IgE-mediated or Toll-like receptor-mediated). However, the precise mechanisms underlying differential mediator release in response to these stimuli are poorly known. This review summarizes our knowledge of MC mediators and will focus on what is known about the discriminatory release of these mediators dependent upon diverse stimuli, MC phenotypes, and species of origin, as well as on the intracellular synthesis, storage, and secretory processes involved.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 392 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Unknown 386 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 68 17%
Student > Bachelor 60 15%
Researcher 51 13%
Student > Master 51 13%
Other 26 7%
Other 62 16%
Unknown 74 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 73 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 72 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 47 12%
Immunology and Microbiology 41 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 21 5%
Other 56 14%
Unknown 82 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2023.
All research outputs
#1,191,510
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#1,041
of 32,223 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,047
of 274,023 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#8
of 182 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,223 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 274,023 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 182 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.