↓ Skip to main content

Inoculation Site from a Cutaneous Melanoma Patient Treated with an Allogeneic Therapeutic Vaccine: A Case Report

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in immunology, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Inoculation Site from a Cutaneous Melanoma Patient Treated with an Allogeneic Therapeutic Vaccine: A Case Report
Published in
Frontiers in immunology, March 2015
DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2015.00144
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mariana Aris, Alicia Inés Bravo, María Marcela Barrio, José Mordoh

Abstract

We have developed a therapeutic vaccine consisting of a mixture of lethally-irradiated allogeneic cutaneous melanoma cell lines with BCG and GM-CSF as adjuvants. The CSF-470 vaccine is currently being assayed in a Phase II-III trial against medium-dose IFN-α2b. All vaccinated patients immunized intradermally developed large edematous erythema reactions, which then transformed into subcutaneous nodules active for several months. However, vaccine injection sites were not routinely biopsied. We describe the case of a female patient, previously classified as stage III, but who, due to the simultaneous discovery of bone metastases only received one vaccination was withdrawn from the study, and continued her treatment elsewhere. This patient developed a post-vaccination nodule which was surgically removed 7 weeks later, and allowed to analyze the reactivity and immune profiling of the inoculation site. An inflammatory reaction with zones of fibrosis, high irrigation, and brisk lymphoid infiltration, primarily composed of CD8(+) and CD20(+) lymphocytes, was observed. There were no remaining BCG bacilli, and scarce CD4(+) and Foxp3(+) T cells were determined. MART-1 Ag was found throughout the vaccination site. CD11c(+) Ag presenting cells were either dispersed or forming dense nests. Some CD11c(+) cells proliferated; most of them contained intracellular MART-1 Ag, and some interacted with CD8(+) lymphocytes. These observations suggest a potent, long-lasting local inflammatory response with recruitment of Ag-presenting cells that incorporate melanoma Ags, probably leading to Ag presentation to naïve T cells.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 40%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 10%
Student > Master 2 10%
Lecturer 1 5%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 5%
Other 3 15%
Unknown 3 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 30%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 20%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 5%
Social Sciences 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 5 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 July 2019.
All research outputs
#19,944,091
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#22,570
of 31,516 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#193,499
of 278,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#103
of 149 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,516 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,140 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 149 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.