↓ Skip to main content

Human and Mouse CD8+CD25+FOXP3+ Regulatory T Cells at Steady State and during Interleukin-2 Therapy

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in immunology, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
174 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
289 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Human and Mouse CD8+CD25+FOXP3+ Regulatory T Cells at Steady State and during Interleukin-2 Therapy
Published in
Frontiers in immunology, April 2015
DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2015.00171
Pubmed ID
Authors

Guillaume Churlaud, Fabien Pitoiset, Fadi Jebbawi, Roberta Lorenzon, Bertrand Bellier, Michelle Rosenzwajg, David Klatzmann

Abstract

In addition to CD4(+) regulatory T cells (Tregs), CD8(+) suppressor T cells are emerging as an important subset of regulatory T cells. Diverse populations of CD8(+) T cells with suppressive activities have been described. Among them, a small population of CD8(+)CD25(+)FOXP3(+) T cells is found both in mice and humans. In contrast to thymic-derived CD4(+)CD25(+)FOXP3(+) Tregs, their origin and their role in the pathophysiology of autoimmune diseases (AIDs) are less understood. We report here the number, phenotype, and function of CD8(+) Tregs cells in mice and humans, at the steady state and in response to low-dose interleukin-2 (IL-2). CD8(+) Tregs represent approximately 0.4 and 0.1% of peripheral blood T cells in healthy humans and mice, respectively. In mice, their frequencies are quite similar in lymph nodes (LNs) and the spleen, but two to threefold higher in Peyer patches and mesenteric LNs. CD8(+) Tregs express low levels of CD127. CD8(+) Tregs express more activation or proliferation markers such as CTLA-4, ICOS, and Ki-67 than other CD8(+) T cells. In vitro, they suppress effector T cell proliferation as well as or even better than CD4(+) Tregs. Owing to constitutive expression of CD25, CD8(+) Tregs are 20- to 40-fold more sensitive to in vitro IL-2 stimulation than CD8(+) effector T cells, but 2-4 times less than CD4(+) Tregs. Nevertheless, low-dose IL-2 dramatically expands and activates CD8(+) Tregs even more than CD4(+) Tregs, in mice and humans. Further studies are warranted to fully appreciate the clinical relevance of CD8(+) Tregs in AIDs and the efficacy of IL-2 treatment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 289 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 283 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 61 21%
Researcher 60 21%
Student > Bachelor 33 11%
Student > Master 23 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 21 7%
Other 42 15%
Unknown 49 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Immunology and Microbiology 62 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 56 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 48 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 42 15%
Neuroscience 5 2%
Other 21 7%
Unknown 55 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2018.
All research outputs
#14,271,061
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#11,321
of 31,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#127,598
of 278,745 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#56
of 148 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,745 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 148 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.