↓ Skip to main content

Utilizing Chimeric Antigen Receptors to Direct Natural Killer Cell Activity

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in immunology, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
9 X users
patent
3 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
137 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
224 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Utilizing Chimeric Antigen Receptors to Direct Natural Killer Cell Activity
Published in
Frontiers in immunology, April 2015
DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2015.00195
Pubmed ID
Authors

David L. Hermanson, Dan S. Kaufman

Abstract

Natural killer (NK) cells represent an attractive lymphocyte population for cancer immunotherapy due to their ability to lyse tumor targets without prior sensitization and without need for human leukocyte antigens-matching. Chimeric antigen receptors (CARs) are able to enhance lymphocyte targeting and activation toward diverse malignancies. CARs consist of an external recognition domain (typically a small chain variable fragment) directed at a specific tumor antigen that is linked with one or more intracellular signaling domains that mediate lymphocyte activation. Most CAR studies have focused on their expression in T cells. However, use of CARs in NK cells is starting to gain traction because they provide a method to redirect these cells more specifically to target refractory cancers. CAR-mediated anti-tumor activity has been demonstrated using NK cell lines, as well as NK cells isolated from peripheral blood, and NK cells produced from human pluripotent stem cells. This review will outline the CAR constructs that have been reported in NK cells with a focus on comparing the use of different signaling domains in combination with other co-activating domains.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 224 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Unknown 219 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 52 23%
Researcher 39 17%
Student > Master 28 13%
Student > Bachelor 27 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 7%
Other 25 11%
Unknown 37 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 49 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 43 19%
Immunology and Microbiology 34 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 31 14%
Engineering 7 3%
Other 19 8%
Unknown 41 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2023.
All research outputs
#1,873,720
of 25,432,721 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#1,748
of 31,647 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,391
of 279,395 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#12
of 173 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,432,721 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,647 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,395 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 173 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.