↓ Skip to main content

Neuroimmunology: An Expanding Frontier in Autoimmunity

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in immunology, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
12 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
114 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Neuroimmunology: An Expanding Frontier in Autoimmunity
Published in
Frontiers in immunology, April 2015
DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2015.00206
Pubmed ID
Authors

Romana Höftberger

Abstract

Anti-neuronal autoimmune encephalitis (AIE) comprises a recently characterized group of immune-mediated disorders that result in limbic, multifocal, or diffuse encephalitis due to direct interaction of autoantibodies with neuronal surface or synaptic proteins. The pathological effects of the autoantibodies vary according to the target antigen but when they are removed, neuronal dysfunction is commonly reversed. Ongoing research on AIE constantly increases the number of novel autoantibodies and expands the spectrum of neurological syndromes that are important in the differential diagnosis of psychiatric illness, dementia, or viral encephalitis. This review summarizes recent advances in AIE, focusing on pathogenetic mechanisms and novel associations with other CNS disorders such as neurodegeneration, relapsing symptoms post-herpes simplex virus encephalitis, and demyelinating diseases. In addition, an algorithmic approach to detect and characterize neuronal cell surface autoantibodies is proposed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 114 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 2 2%
United States 2 2%
Italy 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Unknown 107 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 16%
Other 17 15%
Student > Master 16 14%
Student > Bachelor 11 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 7%
Other 22 19%
Unknown 22 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 36 32%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 15%
Neuroscience 17 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 2%
Other 7 6%
Unknown 25 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 June 2015.
All research outputs
#4,893,695
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#5,442
of 32,130 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,969
of 279,350 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#42
of 173 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,130 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,350 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 173 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.