↓ Skip to main content

Autoantibodies in Renal Diseases – Clinical Significance and Recent Developments in Serological Detection

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in immunology, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Autoantibodies in Renal Diseases – Clinical Significance and Recent Developments in Serological Detection
Published in
Frontiers in immunology, May 2015
DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2015.00221
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gianna Mastroianni-Kirsztajn, Nora Hornig, Wolfgang Schlumberger

Abstract

Autoimmune dysfunctions are the "bête noire" in a range of debilitating nephropathies. Autoimmune-mediated damage to the kidneys can be triggered by autoantibodies directed against specific proteins or renal structures, for example, the phospholipase A2 receptor or the glomerular basement membrane, resulting in glomerular diseases such as primary membranous nephropathy or Goodpasture's disease. Moreover, secondary damage to the kidney can be part of the wide-reaching effects of systemic autoimmune diseases such as vasculitis or systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) - the latter counts lupus nephritis among its most severe manifestations. Systemic autoimmune diseases are characterized by non-organ-specific autoantibodies, directed for example against neutrophil cytoplasmic antigens in systemic vasculitis and against double-stranded DNA and nucleosomes in SLE. A large variety of innovative and highly specific and sensitive autoantibody tests have been developed in the last years that are available to identify autoimmune kidney diseases at an early stage. Thus, serological in vitro diagnostics allow for appropriate interventional therapy in order to prevent disease progression often resulting in need of dialysis and transplantation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 2%
Unknown 41 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 9 21%
Researcher 8 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 10%
Student > Bachelor 4 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Other 10 24%
Unknown 4 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 33%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 17%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Other 6 14%
Unknown 6 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2021.
All research outputs
#1,768,849
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#1,602
of 31,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,021
of 279,120 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#9
of 177 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,120 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 177 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.