↓ Skip to main content

Differential Sensitivity of Regulatory and Effector T Cells to Cell Death: A Prerequisite for Transplant Tolerance

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in immunology, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Differential Sensitivity of Regulatory and Effector T Cells to Cell Death: A Prerequisite for Transplant Tolerance
Published in
Frontiers in immunology, May 2015
DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2015.00242
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sylvaine You

Abstract

Despite significant progress achieved in transplantation, immunosuppressive therapies currently used to prevent graft rejection are still endowed with severe side effects impairing their efficiency over the long term. Thus, the development of graft-specific, non-toxic innovative therapeutic strategies has become a major challenge, the goal being to selectively target alloreactive effector T cells while sparing CD4(+)Foxp3(+) regulatory T cells (Tregs) to promote operational tolerance. Various approaches, notably the one based on monoclonal antibodies or fusion proteins directed against the TCR/CD3 complex, TCR coreceptors, or costimulatory molecules, have been proposed to reduce the alloreactive T cell pool, which is an essential prerequisite to create a therapeutic window allowing Tregs to induce and maintain allograft tolerance. In this mini review, we focus on the differential sensitivity of Tregs and effector T cells to the depleting and inhibitory effect of these immunotherapies, with a particular emphasis on CD3-specific antibodies that beyond their immunosuppressive effect, also express potent tolerogenic capacities.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 7%
Canada 1 7%
Unknown 13 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 40%
Student > Master 3 20%
Researcher 2 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 13%
Student > Bachelor 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 33%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 33%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 7%
Unknown 1 7%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 May 2015.
All research outputs
#22,834,739
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#27,577
of 31,698 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#239,485
of 280,246 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#154
of 182 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,698 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,246 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 182 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.