↓ Skip to main content

Complement System Part I – Molecular Mechanisms of Activation and Regulation

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in immunology, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
13 X users
patent
1 patent
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
1146 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1317 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Complement System Part I – Molecular Mechanisms of Activation and Regulation
Published in
Frontiers in immunology, June 2015
DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2015.00262
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicolas S. Merle, Sarah Elizabeth Church, Veronique Fremeaux-Bacchi, Lubka T. Roumenina

Abstract

Complement is a complex innate immune surveillance system, playing a key role in defense against pathogens and in host homeostasis. The complement system is initiated by conformational changes in recognition molecular complexes upon sensing danger signals. The subsequent cascade of enzymatic reactions is tightly regulated to assure that complement is activated only at specific locations requiring defense against pathogens, thus avoiding host tissue damage. Here, we discuss the recent advances describing the molecular and structural basis of activation and regulation of the complement pathways and their implication on physiology and pathology. This article will review the mechanisms of activation of alternative, classical, and lectin pathways, the formation of C3 and C5 convertases, the action of anaphylatoxins, and the membrane-attack-complex. We will also discuss the importance of structure-function relationships using the example of atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome. Lastly, we will discuss the development and benefits of therapies using complement inhibitors.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,317 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Bosnia and Herzegovina 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 1310 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 242 18%
Student > Bachelor 207 16%
Student > Master 159 12%
Researcher 128 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 68 5%
Other 144 11%
Unknown 369 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 250 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 187 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 160 12%
Immunology and Microbiology 155 12%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 36 3%
Other 134 10%
Unknown 395 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,464,752
of 25,784,004 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#1,293
of 32,391 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,891
of 282,825 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#5
of 179 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,784,004 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,391 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 282,825 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 179 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.