↓ Skip to main content

Gut Microbiota and Immunity: Possible Role in Sudden Infant Death Syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in immunology, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
15 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
89 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Gut Microbiota and Immunity: Possible Role in Sudden Infant Death Syndrome
Published in
Frontiers in immunology, June 2015
DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2015.00269
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paul N. Goldwater

Abstract

The gut microbiome influences the development of the immune system of young mammals; the establishment of a normal gut microbiome is thought to be important for the health of the infant during its early development. As the role of bacteria in the causation of sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) is backed by strong evidence, the balance between host immunity and potential bacterial pathogens is likely to be pivotal. Bacterial colonization of the infant colon is influenced by age, mode of delivery, diet, environment, and antibiotic exposure. The gut microbiome influences several systems including gut integrity and development of the immune system; therefore, gut microflora could be important in protection against bacteria and/or their toxins identified in SIDS infants. The aims of the review are to explore (1) the role of the gut microbiome in relation to the developmentally critical period in which most SIDS cases occur; (2) the mechanisms by which the gut microbiome might induce inflammation resulting in transit of bacteria from the lumen into the bloodstream; and (3) assessment of the clinical, physiological, pathological, and microbiological evidence for bacteremia leading to the final events in SIDS pathogenesis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 1%
South Africa 1 1%
India 1 1%
Croatia 1 1%
Poland 1 1%
Unknown 84 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 21%
Researcher 14 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 11%
Student > Bachelor 9 10%
Student > Postgraduate 5 6%
Other 20 22%
Unknown 12 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 22 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 6%
Other 11 12%
Unknown 14 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2021.
All research outputs
#4,674,686
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#5,065
of 32,130 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,544
of 281,664 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#38
of 179 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,130 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 281,664 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 179 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.