↓ Skip to main content

Pathogenesis of Systemic Sclerosis

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in immunology, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
434 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Pathogenesis of Systemic Sclerosis
Published in
Frontiers in immunology, June 2015
DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2015.00272
Pubmed ID
Authors

Debendra Pattanaik, Monica Brown, Bradley C. Postlethwaite, Arnold E. Postlethwaite

Abstract

Systemic scleroderma (SSc) is one of the most complex systemic autoimmune diseases. It targets the vasculature, connective tissue-producing cells (namely fibroblasts/myofibroblasts), and components of the innate and adaptive immune systems. Clinical and pathologic manifestations of SSc are the result of: (1) innate/adaptive immune system abnormalities leading to production of autoantibodies and cell-mediated autoimmunity, (2) microvascular endothelial cell/small vessel fibroproliferative vasculopathy, and (3) fibroblast dysfunction generating excessive accumulation of collagen and other matrix components in skin and internal organs. All three of these processes interact and affect each other. The disease is heterogeneous in its clinical presentation that likely reflects different genetic or triggering factor (i.e., infection or environmental toxin) influences on the immune system, vasculature, and connective tissue cells. The roles played by other ubiquitous molecular entities (such as lysophospholipids, endocannabinoids, and their diverse receptors and vitamin D) in influencing the immune system, vasculature, and connective tissue cells are just beginning to be realized and studied and may provide insights into new therapeutic approaches to treat SSc.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 434 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Unknown 429 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 59 14%
Researcher 49 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 46 11%
Student > Master 38 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 33 8%
Other 83 19%
Unknown 126 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 150 35%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 47 11%
Immunology and Microbiology 35 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 31 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 2%
Other 29 7%
Unknown 134 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2019.
All research outputs
#6,339,957
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#6,518
of 31,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,595
of 280,146 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#46
of 180 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,146 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 180 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.