↓ Skip to main content

The Dipeptidyl Peptidase Family, Prolyl Oligopeptidase, and Prolyl Carboxypeptidase in the Immune System and Inflammatory Disease, Including Atherosclerosis

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in immunology, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
187 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Dipeptidyl Peptidase Family, Prolyl Oligopeptidase, and Prolyl Carboxypeptidase in the Immune System and Inflammatory Disease, Including Atherosclerosis
Published in
Frontiers in immunology, August 2015
DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2015.00387
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yannick Waumans, Lesley Baerts, Kaat Kehoe, Anne-Marie Lambeir, Ingrid De Meester

Abstract

Research from over the past 20 years has implicated dipeptidyl peptidase (DPP) IV and its family members in many processes and different pathologies of the immune system. Most research has been focused on either DPPIV or just a few of its family members. It is, however, essential to consider the entire DPP family when discussing any one of its members. There is a substantial overlap between family members in their substrate specificity, inhibitors, and functions. In this review, we provide a comprehensive discussion on the role of prolyl-specific peptidases DPPIV, FAP, DPP8, DPP9, dipeptidyl peptidase II, prolyl carboxypeptidase, and prolyl oligopeptidase in the immune system and its diseases. We highlight possible therapeutic targets for the prevention and treatment of atherosclerosis, a condition that lies at the frontier between inflammation and cardiovascular disease.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 187 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 183 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 19%
Student > Master 28 15%
Researcher 23 12%
Student > Bachelor 20 11%
Other 10 5%
Other 22 12%
Unknown 49 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 32 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 30 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 24 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 22 12%
Chemistry 13 7%
Other 17 9%
Unknown 49 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 September 2023.
All research outputs
#20,674,485
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#24,770
of 31,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#202,191
of 275,925 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#115
of 147 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,925 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 147 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.