↓ Skip to main content

Regulatory T-Cell Development in the Human Thymus

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in immunology, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
72 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
250 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Regulatory T-Cell Development in the Human Thymus
Published in
Frontiers in immunology, August 2015
DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2015.00395
Pubmed ID
Authors

Íris Caramalho, Helena Nunes-Cabaço, Russell B. Foxall, Ana E. Sousa

Abstract

The thymus generates a lineage-committed subset of regulatory T-cells (Tregs), best identified by the expression of the transcription factor FOXP3. The development of thymus-derived Tregs is known to require high-avidity interaction with MHC-self peptides leading to the generation of self-reactive Tregs fundamental for the maintenance of self-tolerance. Notwithstanding their crucial role in the control of immune responses, human thymic Treg differentiation remains poorly understood. In this mini-review, we will focus on the developmental stages at which Treg lineage commitment occurs, and their spatial localization in the human thymus, reviewing the molecular requirements, including T-cell receptor and cytokine signaling, as well as the cellular interactions involved. An overview of the impact of described thymic defects on the Treg compartment will be provided, illustrating the importance of these in vivo models to investigate human Treg development.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 250 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 246 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 52 21%
Student > Master 43 17%
Researcher 39 16%
Student > Bachelor 30 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 6%
Other 24 10%
Unknown 47 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Immunology and Microbiology 52 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 45 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 41 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 38 15%
Neuroscience 7 3%
Other 19 8%
Unknown 48 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 August 2015.
All research outputs
#19,944,091
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#22,570
of 31,516 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#188,463
of 275,741 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#100
of 150 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,516 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,741 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 150 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.