↓ Skip to main content

Critical Role of Tumor Microenvironment in Shaping NK Cell Functions: Implication of Hypoxic Stress

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in immunology, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users

Readers on

mendeley
156 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Critical Role of Tumor Microenvironment in Shaping NK Cell Functions: Implication of Hypoxic Stress
Published in
Frontiers in immunology, September 2015
DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2015.00482
Pubmed ID
Authors

Meriem Hasmim, Yosra Messai, Linda Ziani, Jerome Thiery, Jean-Henri Bouhris, Muhammad Zaeem Noman, Salem Chouaib

Abstract

Blurring the boundary between innate and adaptive immune system, natural killer (NK) cells, a key component of the innate immunity, are recognized as potent anticancer mediators. Extensive studies have been detailed on how NK cells get activated and recognize cancer cells. In contrast, few studies have been focused on how tumor microenvironment-mediated immunosubversion and immunoselection of tumor-resistant variants may impair NK cell function. Accumulating evidences indicate that several cell subsets (macrophages, myeloid-derived suppressive cells, T regulatory cells, dendritic cells, cancer-associated fibroblasts, and tumor cells), their secreted factors, as well as metabolic components (i.e., hypoxia) have immunosuppressive roles in the tumor microenvironment and are able to condition NK cells to become anergic. In this review, we will describe how NK cells react with different stromal cells in the tumor microenvironment. This will be followed by a discussion on the role of hypoxic stress in the regulation of NK cell functions. The aim of this review is to provide a better understanding of how the tumor microenvironment impairs NK cell functions, thereby limiting the use of NK cell-based therapy, and we will attempt to suggest more efficient tools to establish a more favorable tumor microenvironment to boost NK cell cytotoxicity and control tumor progression.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 156 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Turkey 1 <1%
Luxembourg 1 <1%
Unknown 154 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 23%
Researcher 31 20%
Student > Master 19 12%
Student > Bachelor 14 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 6%
Other 23 15%
Unknown 24 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 33 21%
Immunology and Microbiology 28 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 27 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 26 17%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 3%
Other 10 6%
Unknown 28 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 October 2015.
All research outputs
#6,876,021
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#7,289
of 31,520 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,342
of 286,056 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#36
of 161 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,520 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,056 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 161 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.