↓ Skip to main content

Radio-Immunotherapy-Induced Immunogenic Cancer Cells as Basis for Induction of Systemic Anti-Tumor Immune Responses – Pre-Clinical Evidence and Ongoing Clinical Applications

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in immunology, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
90 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
126 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Radio-Immunotherapy-Induced Immunogenic Cancer Cells as Basis for Induction of Systemic Anti-Tumor Immune Responses – Pre-Clinical Evidence and Ongoing Clinical Applications
Published in
Frontiers in immunology, October 2015
DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2015.00505
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anja Derer, Lisa Deloch, Yvonne Rubner, Rainer Fietkau, Benjamin Frey, Udo S. Gaipl

Abstract

Radiotherapy (RT) primarily aims to locally destroy the tumor via the induction of DNA damage in the tumor cells. However, the so-called abscopal, namely systemic and immune-mediated, effects of RT move over more and more in the focus of scientists and clinicians since combinations of local irradiation with immune therapy have been demonstrated to induce anti-tumor immunity. We here summarize changes of the phenotype and microenvironment of tumor cells after exposure to irradiation, chemotherapeutic agents, and immune modulating agents rendering the tumor more immunogenic. The impact of therapy-modified tumor cells and damage-associated molecular patterns on local and systemic control of the primary tumor, recurrent tumors, and metastases will be outlined. Finally, clinical studies affirming the bench-side findings of interactions and synergies of radiation therapy and immunotherapy will be discussed. Focus is set on combination of radio(chemo)therapy (RCT) with immune checkpoint inhibitors, growth factor inhibitors, and chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy. Well-deliberated combination of RCT with selected immune therapies and growth factor inhibitors bear the great potential to further improve anti-cancer therapies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Slovenia 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Unknown 120 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 25 20%
Student > Master 23 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 13%
Other 11 9%
Student > Bachelor 8 6%
Other 22 17%
Unknown 20 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 46 37%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 11%
Immunology and Microbiology 14 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 3%
Other 11 9%
Unknown 24 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 October 2015.
All research outputs
#22,759,452
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#27,417
of 31,516 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#248,536
of 290,039 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#151
of 161 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,516 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 290,039 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 161 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.