↓ Skip to main content

Comparative Anatomy of Phagocytic and Immunological Synapses

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in immunology, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
109 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparative Anatomy of Phagocytic and Immunological Synapses
Published in
Frontiers in immunology, January 2016
DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2016.00018
Pubmed ID
Authors

Florence Niedergang, Vincenzo Di Bartolo, Andrés Alcover

Abstract

The generation of phagocytic cups and immunological synapses are crucial events of the innate and adaptive immune responses, respectively. They are triggered by distinct immune receptors and performed by different cell types. However, growing experimental evidence shows that a very close series of molecular and cellular events control these two processes. Thus, the tight and dynamic interplay between receptor signaling, actin and microtubule cytoskeleton, and targeted vesicle traffic are all critical features to build functional phagosomes and immunological synapses. Interestingly, both phagocytic cups and immunological synapses display particular spatial and temporal patterns of receptors and signaling molecules, leading to the notion of "phagocytic synapse." Here, we discuss both types of structures, their organization, and the mechanisms by which they are generated and regulated.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 109 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 22 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 17%
Professor 13 12%
Student > Master 10 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 6%
Other 19 17%
Unknown 20 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 27 25%
Immunology and Microbiology 26 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 5%
Physics and Astronomy 5 5%
Other 7 6%
Unknown 25 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 January 2016.
All research outputs
#23,154,082
of 25,806,080 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#28,019
of 32,415 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#349,578
of 407,896 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#112
of 137 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,080 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,415 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 407,896 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 137 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.