↓ Skip to main content

Targeting NK Cells for Anticancer Immunotherapy: Clinical and Preclinical Approaches

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in immunology, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
58 X users
patent
2 patents

Readers on

mendeley
163 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Targeting NK Cells for Anticancer Immunotherapy: Clinical and Preclinical Approaches
Published in
Frontiers in immunology, April 2016
DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2016.00152
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sebastian Carotta

Abstract

The recent success of checkpoint blockade has highlighted the potential of immunotherapy approaches for cancer treatment. Although the majority of approved immunotherapy drugs target T cell subsets, it is appreciated that other components of the immune system have important roles in tumor immune surveillance as well and thus represent promising additional targets for immunotherapy. Natural killer (NK) cells are the body's first line of defense against infected or transformed cells, as they kill target cells in an antigen-independent manner. Although several studies have clearly demonstrated the active role of NK cells in cancer immune surveillance, only few clinically approved therapies currently exist that harness their potential. Our increased understanding of NK cell biology over the past few years has renewed the interest in NK cell-based anticancer therapies, which has lead to a steady increase of NK cell-based clinical and preclinical trials. Here, the role of NK cells in cancer immune surveillance is summarized, and several novel approaches to enhance NK cell cytotoxicity against cancer are discussed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 58 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 163 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Turkey 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Unknown 160 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 40 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 17%
Student > Master 20 12%
Student > Bachelor 17 10%
Other 12 7%
Other 21 13%
Unknown 25 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Immunology and Microbiology 37 23%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 28 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 25 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 19 12%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 10 6%
Other 17 10%
Unknown 27 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 49. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 August 2023.
All research outputs
#873,246
of 25,750,437 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#771
of 32,315 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,110
of 314,517 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#2
of 135 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,750,437 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,315 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 314,517 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 135 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.