↓ Skip to main content

Paradoxical Roles of the Neutrophil in Sepsis: Protective and Deleterious

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in immunology, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
170 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
202 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Paradoxical Roles of the Neutrophil in Sepsis: Protective and Deleterious
Published in
Frontiers in immunology, April 2016
DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2016.00155
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fabiane Sônego, Fernanda Vargas e Silva Castanheira, Raphael Gomes Ferreira, Alexandre Kanashiro, Caio Abner Vitorino Gonçalves Leite, Daniele Carvalho Nascimento, David Fernando Colón, Vanessa de Fátima Borges, José Carlos Alves-Filho, Fernando Queiróz Cunha

Abstract

Sepsis, an overwhelming inflammatory response syndrome secondary to infection, is one of the costliest and deadliest medical conditions worldwide. Neutrophils are classically considered to be essential players in the host defense against invading pathogens. However, several investigations have shown that impairment of neutrophil migration to the site of infection, also referred to as neutrophil paralysis, occurs during severe sepsis, resulting in an inability of the host to contain and eliminate the infection. On the other hand, the neutrophil antibacterial arsenal contributes to tissue damage and the development of organ dysfunction during sepsis. In this review, we provide an overview of the main events in which neutrophils play a beneficial or deleterious role in the outcome of sepsis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 202 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 200 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 28 14%
Student > Master 25 12%
Student > Bachelor 24 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 10%
Other 36 18%
Unknown 46 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 35 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 30 15%
Immunology and Microbiology 28 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 11 5%
Other 22 11%
Unknown 55 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2016.
All research outputs
#7,968,340
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#9,552
of 31,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,097
of 312,468 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#38
of 132 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,468 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 132 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.