↓ Skip to main content

Signaling in Effector Lymphocytes: Insights toward Safer Immunotherapy

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in immunology, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Signaling in Effector Lymphocytes: Insights toward Safer Immunotherapy
Published in
Frontiers in immunology, May 2016
DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2016.00176
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kamalakannan Rajasekaran, Matthew J. Riese, Sridhar Rao, Li Wang, Monica S. Thakar, Charles L. Sentman, Subramaniam Malarkannan

Abstract

Receptors on T and NK cells systematically propagate highly complex signaling cascades that direct immune effector functions, leading to protective immunity. While extensive studies have delineated hundreds of signaling events that take place upon receptor engagement, the precise molecular mechanism that differentially regulates the induction or repression of a unique effector function is yet to be fully defined. Such knowledge can potentiate the tailoring of signal transductions and transform cancer immunotherapies. Targeted manipulations of signaling cascades can augment one effector function such as antitumor cytotoxicity while contain the overt generation of pro-inflammatory cytokines that contribute to treatment-related toxicity such as "cytokine storm" and "cytokine-release syndrome" or lead to autoimmune diseases. Here, we summarize how individual signaling molecules or nodes may be optimally targeted to permit selective ablation of toxic immune side effects.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 41 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 17%
Student > Master 6 14%
Student > Bachelor 6 14%
Researcher 5 12%
Other 4 10%
Other 8 19%
Unknown 6 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 24%
Immunology and Microbiology 8 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Other 6 14%
Unknown 6 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 May 2020.
All research outputs
#6,578,681
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#6,993
of 31,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,966
of 326,318 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#30
of 140 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,318 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 140 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.