↓ Skip to main content

Differential Expression of Immune Checkpoint Modulators on In Vitro Primed CD4+ and CD8+ T Cells

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in immunology, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Differential Expression of Immune Checkpoint Modulators on In Vitro Primed CD4+ and CD8+ T Cells
Published in
Frontiers in immunology, June 2016
DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2016.00221
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nina C. Sabins, Benjamin C. Harman, Linda R. Barone, Shixue Shen, Sandra Santulli-Marotto

Abstract

PD-1, TIM-3, and LAG-3 are molecules shown to have immune modulatory properties, and although initially classified as indicators of T cell hyporesponsiveness, it has become clear that they are also associated with the normal course of T cell activation. Functional studies have focused mainly on CD8(+) T cells during chronic inflammation due to interest in co-opting the cellular immune response to eliminate viral or cancerous threats; however, there remains a relative lack of data regarding the expression of these molecules on CD4(+) T cells. Here, we report that expression of the immune checkpoint (IC) molecules PD-1, LAG-3, and TIM-3 are differentially expressed on CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cells in the allogeneic response resulting from a mixed lymphocyte reaction. In these studies, PD-1 expression is higher on CD4(+) T cells compared to CD8(+) T cells. In contrast, TIM-3 is expressed at higher levels on CD8(+) T cells compared to CD4(+) T cells with an apparent reciprocity in that PD-1(+) CD4(+) T cells are frequently TIM-3(lo/-), while TIM-3-expressing CD8(+) T cells are largely PD-1(lo/-). In addition, there is a decrease in the frequency of TIM-3(+) CD4(+) cells producing IFN-γ and IL-5 compared to TIM-3(+) CD8(+) cells. Lastly, the memory T cell phenotype within each IC-expressing subset differs between CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cells. These findings highlight key differences in IC expression patterns between CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cells and may allow for more effective therapeutic targeting of these molecules in the future.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 2%
France 1 2%
Korea, Republic of 1 2%
Unknown 63 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 20%
Student > Master 9 14%
Student > Bachelor 5 8%
Professor 5 8%
Other 11 17%
Unknown 6 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Immunology and Microbiology 22 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 12%
Unspecified 1 2%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 8 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 June 2016.
All research outputs
#14,276,973
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#11,371
of 31,513 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#179,143
of 353,548 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#50
of 120 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,513 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,548 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 120 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.