↓ Skip to main content

Human Circulating and Tissue-Resident CD56bright Natural Killer Cell Populations

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in immunology, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Readers on

mendeley
206 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Human Circulating and Tissue-Resident CD56bright Natural Killer Cell Populations
Published in
Frontiers in immunology, June 2016
DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2016.00262
Pubmed ID
Authors

Janine E. Melsen, Gertjan Lugthart, Arjan C. Lankester, Marco W. Schilham

Abstract

Two human natural killer (NK) cell subsets are usually distinguished, displaying the CD56(dim)CD16(+) and the CD56(bright)CD16(-/+) phenotype. This distinction is based on NK cells present in blood, where the CD56(dim) NK cells predominate. However, CD56(bright) NK cells outnumber CD56(dim) NK cells in the human body due to the fact that they are predominant in peripheral and lymphoid tissues. Interestingly, within the total CD56(bright) NK cell compartment, a major phenotypical and functional diversity is observed, as demonstrated by the discovery of tissue-resident CD56(bright) NK cells in the uterus, liver, and lymphoid tissues. Uterus-resident CD56(bright) NK cells express CD49a while the liver- and lymphoid tissue-resident CD56(bright) NK cells are characterized by co-expression of CD69 and CXCR6. Tissue-resident CD56(bright) NK cells have a low natural cytotoxicity and produce little interferon-γ upon monokine stimulation. Their distribution and specific phenotype suggest that the tissue-resident CD56(bright) NK cells exert tissue-specific functions. In this review, we examine the CD56(bright) NK cell diversity by discussing the distribution, phenotype, and function of circulating and tissue-resident CD56(bright) NK cells. In addition, we address the ongoing debate concerning the developmental relationship between circulating CD56(bright) and CD56(dim) NK cells and speculate on the position of tissue-resident CD56(bright) NK cells. We conclude that distinguishing tissue-resident CD56(bright) NK cells from circulating CD56(bright) NK cells is a prerequisite for the better understanding of the specific role of CD56(bright) NK cells in the complex process of human immune regulation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 206 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Turkey 1 <1%
Unknown 205 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 40 19%
Researcher 28 14%
Student > Master 27 13%
Student > Bachelor 24 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 6%
Other 21 10%
Unknown 54 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Immunology and Microbiology 46 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 35 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 29 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 28 14%
Computer Science 2 <1%
Other 8 4%
Unknown 58 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 July 2016.
All research outputs
#15,168,964
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#14,207
of 31,513 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#201,107
of 366,930 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#64
of 121 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,513 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,930 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 121 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.