↓ Skip to main content

Commentary: Basic Research in HIV Vaccinology Is Hampered by Reductionist Thinking

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in immunology, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Commentary: Basic Research in HIV Vaccinology Is Hampered by Reductionist Thinking
Published in
Frontiers in immunology, July 2016
DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2016.00266
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marc H. V. Van Regenmortel

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 2 50%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 25%
Student > Master 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 50%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 July 2016.
All research outputs
#17,285,036
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#20,293
of 31,513 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#240,664
of 370,460 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#87
of 117 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,513 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 370,460 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 117 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.