↓ Skip to main content

Fas–Fas Ligand: Checkpoint of T Cell Functions in Multiple Sclerosis

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in immunology, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
118 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
292 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Fas–Fas Ligand: Checkpoint of T Cell Functions in Multiple Sclerosis
Published in
Frontiers in immunology, September 2016
DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2016.00382
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elisabetta Volpe, Manolo Sambucci, Luca Battistini, Giovanna Borsellino

Abstract

Fas and Fas Ligand (FasL) are two molecules involved in the regulation of cell death. Their interaction leads to apoptosis of thymocytes that fail to rearrange correctly their T cell receptor (TCR) genes and of those that recognize self-antigens, a process called negative selection; moreover, Fas-FasL interaction leads to activation-induced cell death, a form of apoptosis induced by repeated TCR stimulation, responsible for the peripheral deletion of activated T cells. Both control mechanisms are particularly relevant in the context of autoimmune diseases, such as multiple sclerosis (MS), where T cells exert an immune response against self-antigens. This concept is well demonstrated by the development of autoimmune diseases in mice and humans with defects in Fas or FasL. In recent years, several new aspects of T cell functions in MS have been elucidated, such as the pathogenic role of T helper (Th) 17 cells and the protective role of T regulatory (Treg) cells. Thus, in this review, we summarize the role of the Fas-FasL pathway, with particular focus on its involvement in MS. We then discuss recent advances concerning the role of Fas-FasL in regulating Th17 and Treg cells' functions, in the context of MS.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 292 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 290 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 48 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 46 16%
Student > Master 31 11%
Researcher 25 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 5%
Other 28 10%
Unknown 100 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 66 23%
Immunology and Microbiology 38 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 23 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 8%
Neuroscience 8 3%
Other 31 11%
Unknown 104 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2022.
All research outputs
#16,061,963
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#16,734
of 31,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#195,976
of 330,925 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#89
of 167 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,925 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 167 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.