↓ Skip to main content

CD4+ T Follicular Helper and IgA+ B Cell Numbers in Gut Biopsies from HIV-Infected Subjects on Antiretroviral Therapy Are Similar to HIV-Uninfected Individuals

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in immunology, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
CD4+ T Follicular Helper and IgA+ B Cell Numbers in Gut Biopsies from HIV-Infected Subjects on Antiretroviral Therapy Are Similar to HIV-Uninfected Individuals
Published in
Frontiers in immunology, October 2016
DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2016.00438
Pubmed ID
Authors

John Zaunders, Mark Danta, Michelle Bailey, Gerald Mak, Katherine Marks, Nabila Seddiki, Yin Xu, David J. Templeton, David A. Cooper, Mark A. Boyd, Anthony D. Kelleher, Kersten K. Koelsch

Abstract

Disruption of gastrointestinal tract epithelial and immune barriers contribute to microbial translocation, systemic inflammation, and progression of HIV-1 infection. Antiretroviral therapy (ART) may lead to reconstitution of CD4(+) T cells in gut-associated lymphoid tissue (GALT), but its impact on humoral immunity within GALT is unclear. Therefore, we studied CD4(+) subsets, including T follicular helper cells (Tfh), as well as resident B cells that have switched to IgA production, in gut biopsies, from HIV(+) subjects on suppressive ART compared to HIV-negative controls (HNC). Twenty-three HIV(+) subjects on ART and 22 HNC undergoing colonoscopy were recruited to the study. Single-cell suspensions were prepared from biopsies from left colon (LC), right colon (RC), and terminal ileum (TI). T and B lymphocyte subsets, as well as EpCAM(+) epithelial cells, were accurately enumerated by flow cytometry, using counting beads. No significant differences in the number of recovered epithelial cells were observed between the two subject groups. However, the median TI CD4(+) T cell count/10(6) epithelial cells was 2.4-fold lower in HIV(+) subjects versus HNC (19,679 versus 47,504 cells; p = 0.02). Similarly, median LC CD4(+) T cell counts were reduced in HIV(+) subjects (8,358 versus 18,577; p = 0.03) but were not reduced in RC. Importantly, we found no significant differences in Tfh or IgA(+) B cell counts at either site between HIV(+) subjects and HNC. Further analysis showed no difference in CD4(+), Tfh, or IgA(+) B cell counts between subjects who commenced ART in primary compared to chronic HIV-1 infection. Despite the decrease in total CD4 T cells, we could not identify a selective decrease of other key subsets of CD4(+) T cells, including CCR5(+) cells, CD127(+) long-term memory cells, CD103(+) tissue-resident cells, or CD161(+) cells (surrogate marker for Th17), but there was a slight increase in the proportion of T regulatory cells. While there were lower absolute CD4(+) counts in the TI and LC in HIV(+) subjects on ART, they were not associated with significantly reduced Tfh cell counts or IgA(+) B cells, suggesting that this important vanguard of adaptive immune defense against luminal microbial products is normalized following ART.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 34 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 18%
Student > Bachelor 4 12%
Student > Master 4 12%
Lecturer 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 9 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Immunology and Microbiology 8 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 6%
Psychology 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 10 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 October 2016.
All research outputs
#16,784,715
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#18,424
of 31,698 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#198,712
of 321,150 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#128
of 211 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,698 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 321,150 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 211 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.