You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Reflections on HLA Epitope-Based Matching for Transplantation
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in immunology, November 2016
|
DOI | 10.3389/fimmu.2016.00469 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Rene J. Duquesnoy |
Abstract |
HLA antibodies are primary causes of transplant rejection; they recognize epitopes that can be structurally defined by eplets. There are many reviews about HLA epitope-based matching in transplantation. This article describes some personal reflections about epitopes including a historical perspective of HLA typing at the antigen and allele levels, the repertoires of antibody-verified HLA epitopes, the use of HLAMatchmaker in determining the specificities of antibodies tested in different assays, and, finally, possible strategies to control HLA antibody responses. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Switzerland | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 66 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 11 | 17% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 14% |
Other | 7 | 11% |
Student > Master | 7 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 9% |
Other | 14 | 21% |
Unknown | 12 | 18% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 30% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 11 | 17% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 12% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 11% |
Psychology | 2 | 3% |
Other | 3 | 5% |
Unknown | 15 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2018.
All research outputs
#17,236,404
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#20,123
of 31,520 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#260,851
of 417,109 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#191
of 253 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,520 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 417,109 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 253 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.