↓ Skip to main content

Stromal Fibroblasts in Tertiary Lymphoid Structures: A Novel Target in Chronic Inflammation

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in immunology, November 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

f1000
1 research highlight platform

Readers on

mendeley
188 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Stromal Fibroblasts in Tertiary Lymphoid Structures: A Novel Target in Chronic Inflammation
Published in
Frontiers in immunology, November 2016
DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2016.00477
Pubmed ID
Authors

Francesca Barone, David H. Gardner, Saba Nayar, Nathalie Steinthal, Christopher D. Buckley, Sanjiv A. Luther

Abstract

Tertiary lymphoid structures (TLS) are organized aggregates of lymphocytes, myeloid, and stromal cells that provide ectopic hubs for acquired immune responses. TLS share phenotypical and functional features with secondary lymphoid organs (SLO); however, they require persistent inflammatory signals to arise and are often observed at target sites of autoimmune disease, chronic infection, cancer, and organ transplantation. Over the past 10 years, important progress has been made in our understanding of the role of stromal fibroblasts in SLO development, organization, and function. A complex and stereotyped series of events regulate fibroblast differentiation from embryonic life in SLOs to lymphoid organ architecture observed in adults. In contrast, TLS-associated fibroblasts differentiate from postnatal, locally activated mesenchyme, predominantly in settings of inflammation and persistent antigen presentation. Therefore, there are critical differences in the cellular and molecular requirements that regulate SLO versus TLS development that ultimately impact on stromal and hematopoietic cell function. These differences may contribute to the pathogenic nature of TLS in the context of chronic inflammation and malignant transformation and offer a window of opportunity for therapeutic interventions in TLS associated pathologies.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 188 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 188 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 50 27%
Researcher 25 13%
Student > Bachelor 16 9%
Student > Master 14 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 5%
Other 25 13%
Unknown 48 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Immunology and Microbiology 35 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 32 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 27 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 22 12%
Chemistry 3 2%
Other 17 9%
Unknown 52 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2017.
All research outputs
#17,313,103
of 25,411,814 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#20,363
of 31,614 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#206,805
of 319,128 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#183
of 242 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,411,814 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,614 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,128 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 242 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.