↓ Skip to main content

Skewed Lung CCR4 to CCR6 CD4+ T Cell Ratio in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis Is Associated with Pulmonary Function

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in immunology, November 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Skewed Lung CCR4 to CCR6 CD4+ T Cell Ratio in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis Is Associated with Pulmonary Function
Published in
Frontiers in immunology, November 2016
DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2016.00516
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ayodeji Adegunsoye, Cara L. Hrusch, Catherine A. Bonham, Mohammad R. Jaffery, Kelly M. Blaine, Meghan Sullivan, Matthew M. Churpek, Mary E. Strek, Imre Noth, Anne I. Sperling

Abstract

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a progressive, fatal lung disease. While it has been suggested that T cells may contribute to IPF pathogenesis, these studies have focused primarily on T cells outside of the pulmonary interstitium. Thus, the role of T cells in the diseased lung tissue remains unclear. To identify whether specific CD4(+) T cell subsets are differentially represented in lung tissue from patients with IPF. CD4(+) T cell subsets were measured in lung tissue obtained from patients with IPF at the time of lung transplantation, and from age- and gender-matched organ donors with no known lung disease. Subsets were identified by their surface expression of CCR4, CCR6, and CXCR3 chemokine receptors. CD4(+) T cell subsets were correlated with measurements of lung function obtained prior to transplantation. Compared to controls, IPF patients had a higher proportion of lung CD4(+) T cells, a higher proportion of CCR4(+) CD4(+) T cells, and a lower proportion of CCR6(+) CD4(+) T cells. The increase in CCR4(+) CD4(+) T cells in IPF lung tissue was not due to increased Tregs. Intriguingly, the increase in the ratio of CCR4(+) cells to CCR6(+) cells correlated significantly with better lung function. Our findings suggest a new paradigm that not all T cell infiltrates in IPF lungs are detrimental, but instead, specialized subsets may actually be protective. Thus, augmentation of the chemokines that recruit protective T cells, while blocking chemokines that recruit detrimental T cells, may constitute a novel approach to IPF therapy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 30 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 13%
Lecturer 3 10%
Other 3 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Other 5 17%
Unknown 7 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Immunology and Microbiology 7 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 7%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 9 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 November 2016.
All research outputs
#22,758,309
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#27,414
of 31,513 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#355,109
of 415,170 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#224
of 240 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,513 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 415,170 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 240 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.