You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Optimizing Research Methods to Understand HIV-Exposed Uninfected Infant and Child Morbidity: Report of the Second HEU Infant and Child Workshop
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in immunology, December 2016
|
DOI | 10.3389/fimmu.2016.00576 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Amy L. Slogrove, Moherndran Archary, Mark F. Cotton |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 17% |
South Africa | 1 | 17% |
Canada | 1 | 17% |
Switzerland | 1 | 17% |
Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 5 | 83% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 23 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 6 | 26% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 22% |
Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 13% |
Student > Master | 3 | 13% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 9% |
Other | 2 | 9% |
Unknown | 2 | 9% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 43% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 13% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 9% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 9% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 4% |
Other | 2 | 9% |
Unknown | 3 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 February 2017.
All research outputs
#8,544,090
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#10,799
of 31,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#143,359
of 420,460 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#111
of 263 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 420,460 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 263 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.