↓ Skip to main content

MICA Expression Is Regulated by Cell Adhesion and Contact in a FAK/Src-Dependent Manner

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in immunology, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
MICA Expression Is Regulated by Cell Adhesion and Contact in a FAK/Src-Dependent Manner
Published in
Frontiers in immunology, January 2017
DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2016.00687
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gerald Moncayo, Da Lin, Michael T. McCarthy, Aleksandra A. Watson, Christopher A. O’Callaghan

Abstract

MICA is a major ligand for the NKG2D immune receptor, which plays a key role in activating natural killer (NK) cells and cytotoxic T cells. We analyzed NKG2D ligand expression on a range of cell types and could demonstrate that MICA expression levels were closely linked to cellular growth mode. While the expression of other NKG2D ligands was largely independent of cell growth mode, MICA expression was mainly found on cells cultured as adherent cells. In addition, MICA surface expression was reduced through increase in cell-cell contact or loss of cell-matrix adherence. Furthermore, we found that the reduction in MICA expression was modulated by focal adhesion kinase (FAK)/Src signaling and associated with increased susceptibility to NK cell-mediated killing. While the mechanisms of tumor immune evasion are not fully understood, the reduction of MICA expression following loss of attachment poises a potential way by which metastasizing tumor cells avoid immune detection. The role of FAK/Src in this process indicates a potential therapeutic approach to modulate MICA expression and immune recognition of tumor cells during metastasis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 2%
Unknown 40 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 24%
Student > Bachelor 7 17%
Other 4 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 2%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 7 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 22%
Immunology and Microbiology 8 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 17%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 8 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 February 2017.
All research outputs
#15,193,124
of 25,411,814 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#14,242
of 31,614 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#223,991
of 420,609 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#197
of 361 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,411,814 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,614 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 420,609 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 361 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.