↓ Skip to main content

Cytotoxic CD4 T Cells—Friend or Foe during Viral Infection?

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in immunology, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
165 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
208 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cytotoxic CD4 T Cells—Friend or Foe during Viral Infection?
Published in
Frontiers in immunology, January 2017
DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2017.00019
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jennifer A. Juno, David van Bockel, Stephen J. Kent, Anthony D. Kelleher, John J. Zaunders, C. Mee Ling Munier

Abstract

CD4 T cells with cytotoxic function were once thought to be an artifact due to long-term in vitro cultures but have in more recent years become accepted and reported in the literature in response to a number of viral infections. In this review, we focus on cytotoxic CD4 T cells in the context of human viral infections and in some infections that affect mice and non-human primates. We examine the effector mechanisms used by cytotoxic CD4 cells, the phenotypes that describe this population, and the transcription factors and pathways that lead to their induction following infection. We further consider the cells that are the predominant targets of this effector subset and describe the viral infections in which CD4 cytotoxic T lymphocytes have been shown to play a protective or pathologic role. Cytotoxic CD4 T cells are detected in the circulation at much higher levels than previously realized and are now recognized to have an important role in the immune response to viral infections.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 208 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 208 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 57 27%
Researcher 27 13%
Student > Master 15 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 7%
Student > Bachelor 15 7%
Other 21 10%
Unknown 58 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Immunology and Microbiology 61 29%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 27 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 22 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 20 10%
Engineering 4 2%
Other 14 7%
Unknown 60 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2023.
All research outputs
#5,406,085
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#6,075
of 31,531 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#101,186
of 422,539 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#79
of 373 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,531 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 422,539 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 373 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.