↓ Skip to main content

From the Cradle to the Grave: The Role of Macrophages in Erythropoiesis and Erythrophagocytosis

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in immunology, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
182 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
219 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
From the Cradle to the Grave: The Role of Macrophages in Erythropoiesis and Erythrophagocytosis
Published in
Frontiers in immunology, February 2017
DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2017.00073
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thomas R. L. Klei, Sanne M. Meinderts, Timo K. van den Berg, Robin van Bruggen

Abstract

Erythropoiesis is a highly regulated process where sequential events ensure the proper differentiation of hematopoietic stem cells into, ultimately, red blood cells (RBCs). Macrophages in the bone marrow play an important role in hematopoiesis by providing signals that induce differentiation and proliferation of the earliest committed erythroid progenitors. Subsequent differentiation toward the erythroblast stage is accompanied by the formation of so-called erythroblastic islands where a central macrophage provides further cues to induce erythroblast differentiation, expansion, and hemoglobinization. Finally, erythroblasts extrude their nuclei that are phagocytosed by macrophages whereas the reticulocytes are released into the circulation. While in circulation, RBCs slowly accumulate damage that is repaired by macrophages of the spleen. Finally, after 120 days of circulation, senescent RBCs are removed from the circulation by splenic and liver macrophages. Macrophages are thus important for RBCs throughout their lifespan. Finally, in a range of diseases, the delicate interplay between macrophages and both developing and mature RBCs is disturbed. Here, we review the current knowledge on the contribution of macrophages to erythropoiesis and erythrophagocytosis in health and disease.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 219 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 218 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 42 19%
Researcher 30 14%
Student > Master 28 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 9%
Student > Bachelor 16 7%
Other 25 11%
Unknown 58 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 60 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 25 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 15 7%
Engineering 7 3%
Other 25 11%
Unknown 69 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 September 2018.
All research outputs
#6,440,317
of 25,703,943 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#6,653
of 32,216 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#109,960
of 426,650 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#89
of 385 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,703,943 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,216 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 426,650 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 385 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.