↓ Skip to main content

Regulation of Murine Natural Killer Cell Development

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in immunology, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
171 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Regulation of Murine Natural Killer Cell Development
Published in
Frontiers in immunology, February 2017
DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2017.00130
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wilford Goh, Nicholas D. Huntington

Abstract

Natural killer (NK) cells are effector lymphocytes of the innate immune system that are known for their ability to kill transformed and virus-infected cells. NK cells originate from hematopoietic stem cells in the bone marrow, and studies on mouse models have revealed that NK cell development is a complex, yet tightly regulated process, which is dependent on both intrinsic and extrinsic factors. The development of NK cells can be broadly categorized into two phases: lineage commitment and maturation. Efforts to better define the developmental framework of NK cells have led to the identification of several murine NK progenitor populations and mature NK cell subsets, each defined by a varied set of cell surface markers. Nevertheless, the relationship between some of these NK cell subsets remains to be determined. The classical approach to studying both NK cell development and function is to identify the transcription factors involved and elucidate the mechanistic action of each transcription factor. In this regard, recent studies have provided further insight into the mechanisms by which transcription factors, such as ID2, FOXO1, Kruppel-like factor 2, and GATA-binding protein 3 regulate various aspects of NK cell biology. It is also becoming evident that the biology of NK cells is not only transcriptionally regulated but also determined by epigenetic alterations and posttranscriptional regulation of gene expression by microRNAs. This review summarizes recent progress made in NK development, focusing primarily on transcriptional regulators and their mechanistic actions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 171 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Unknown 169 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 54 32%
Student > Master 23 13%
Student > Bachelor 20 12%
Researcher 18 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 8%
Other 13 8%
Unknown 29 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Immunology and Microbiology 52 30%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 37 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 9%
Chemistry 4 2%
Other 9 5%
Unknown 33 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 February 2017.
All research outputs
#20,824,878
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#25,074
of 32,016 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#341,899
of 450,118 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#348
of 403 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,016 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 450,118 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 403 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.