↓ Skip to main content

Under Pressure: Interactions between Commensal Microbiota and the Teleost Immune System

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in immunology, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
15 X users

Readers on

mendeley
213 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Under Pressure: Interactions between Commensal Microbiota and the Teleost Immune System
Published in
Frontiers in immunology, May 2017
DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2017.00559
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cecelia Kelly, Irene Salinas

Abstract

Commensal microorganisms inhabit every mucosal surface of teleost fish. At these surfaces, microorganisms directly and indirectly shape the teleost immune system. This review provides a comprehensive overview of how the microbiota and microbiota-derived products influence both the mucosal and systemic immune system of fish. The cross talk between the microbiota and the teleost immune system shifts significantly under stress or disease scenarios rendering commensals into opportunists or pathogens. Lessons learnt from germ-free fish models as well as from oral administration of live probiotics to fish highlight the vast impact that microbiota have on immune development, antibody production, mucosal homeostasis, and resistance to stress. Future studies should dissect the specific mechanisms by which different members of the fish microbiota and the metabolites they produce interact with pathogens, with other commensals, and with the teleost immune system.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 213 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 213 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 40 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 39 18%
Student > Master 28 13%
Student > Bachelor 23 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 5%
Other 28 13%
Unknown 45 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 64 30%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 30 14%
Immunology and Microbiology 22 10%
Environmental Science 12 6%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 8 4%
Other 20 9%
Unknown 57 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2023.
All research outputs
#4,367,995
of 25,436,226 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#4,753
of 31,651 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,891
of 324,866 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#77
of 380 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,436,226 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,651 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,866 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 380 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.