↓ Skip to main content

Primary Immunodeficiency Diseases: Current and Emerging Therapeutics

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in immunology, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
87 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Primary Immunodeficiency Diseases: Current and Emerging Therapeutics
Published in
Frontiers in immunology, August 2017
DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2017.00937
Pubmed ID
Authors

Beatriz E. Marciano, Steven M. Holland

Abstract

Primary immunodeficiency diseases (PID) result from defects in genes affecting the immune and other systems in many and varied ways (1, 2). Until the last few years, treatments have been largely supportive, with the exception of bone marrow transplantation. However, recent advances in immunobiology, genetics, and the explosion of discovery and commercialization of biologic modifiers have drastically altered the landscape and opportunities in clinical immunology. Therapeutic options and life expectancy of PID patients have also improved dramatically, in large part as a result of better prevention and treatment of infections as well as better understanding and treatment of autoimmune complications (3). As early-life infection-related mortality declines we should anticipate the emergence of other conditions that were previously not appreciated, including malignancies and degenerative disorders unmasked by increasing longevity (4). The genomic revolution has identified literally hundreds of new genetic etiologies of immune dysfunction, many of which are or will soon be eligible for targeted therapies. These emerging immunomodulatory agents represent new therapeutic options in PIDs (5).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 87 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 11 13%
Researcher 10 11%
Student > Bachelor 10 11%
Student > Postgraduate 7 8%
Student > Master 7 8%
Other 20 23%
Unknown 22 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 37 43%
Immunology and Microbiology 9 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 7%
Engineering 2 2%
Other 1 1%
Unknown 26 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2020.
All research outputs
#6,548,606
of 25,541,640 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#6,918
of 31,950 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#94,659
of 328,051 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#111
of 446 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,541,640 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,950 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,051 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 446 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.