Title |
Dead Tumor Cells Expressing Infectious Salmon Anemia Virus Fusogenic Protein Favor Antigen Cross-Priming In Vitro
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in immunology, October 2017
|
DOI | 10.3389/fimmu.2017.01170 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jonathan Morales, Carlos Barrera-Avalos, Carlos Castro, Stephanie Castillo, Claudio Barrientos, Claudia Robles-Planells, Ximena López, Ernesto Torres, Margarita Montoya, Marcelo Cortez-San Martín, Denise Riquelme, Alejandro Escobar, Ricardo Fernández, Mónica Imarai, Daniela Sauma, Leonel E. Rojo, Elias Leiva-Salcedo, Claudio Acuña-Castillo |
Abstract |
Antigen cross-presentation is a crucial step in the assembly of an antitumor immune response leading to activation of naïve CD8 T cells. This process has been extensively used in clinical trials, in which dendritic cells generated in vitro are loaded with tumor antigens and then autotransplanted to the patients. Recently, the use of autologous transplant of dendritic cells fused with dying tumor cells has demonstrated good results in clinical studies. In this work, we generated a similar process in vivo by treating mice with dead tumor cells [cell bodies (CBs)] expressing the fusogenic protein of the infectious salmon anemia virus (ISAV). ISAV fusion protein retains its fusogenic capability when is expressed on mammalian cells in vitro and the CBs expressing it facilitates DCs maturation, antigen transfer by antigen-presenting cells, and increase cross-presentation by DCs in vitro. Additionally, we observed in the melanoma model that CBs with or without ISAV fusion protein reduce tumor growth in prophylactic treatment; however, only ISAV expressing CBs showed an increase CD4 and CD8 cells in spleen. Overall, our results suggest that CBs could be used as a complement with other type of strategies to amplify antitumor immune response. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Mexico | 1 | 33% |
Switzerland | 1 | 33% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 20 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 25% |
Researcher | 3 | 15% |
Professor | 2 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 10% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 10% |
Other | 4 | 20% |
Unknown | 2 | 10% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Immunology and Microbiology | 5 | 25% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 25% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 20% |
Environmental Science | 1 | 5% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 5% |
Other | 2 | 10% |
Unknown | 2 | 10% |