You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Clinical Application of MicroRNAs in Infectious Disease
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in immunology, September 2017
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fimmu.2017.01182 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ruth E. Drury, Daniel O’Connor, Andrew J. Pollard |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 2 | 18% |
| Indonesia | 1 | 9% |
| Mexico | 1 | 9% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 6 | 55% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 55% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 18% |
| Scientists | 2 | 18% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 234 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 234 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 31 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 31 | 13% |
| Researcher | 29 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 27 | 12% |
| Other | 14 | 6% |
| Other | 35 | 15% |
| Unknown | 67 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 57 | 24% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 24 | 10% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 20 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 9 | 4% |
| Other | 31 | 13% |
| Unknown | 77 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 October 2019.
All research outputs
#6,508,088
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#6,693
of 32,217 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#92,481
of 331,670 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#122
of 513 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,217 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,670 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 513 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.