↓ Skip to main content

Bruton’s Tyrosine Kinase: An Emerging Key Player in Innate Immunity

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in immunology, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
8 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
193 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Bruton’s Tyrosine Kinase: An Emerging Key Player in Innate Immunity
Published in
Frontiers in immunology, November 2017
DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2017.01454
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alexander N. R. Weber, Zsofia Bittner, Xiao Liu, Truong-Minh Dang, Markus Philipp Radsak, Cornelia Brunner

Abstract

Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) was initially discovered as a critical mediator of B cell receptor signaling in the development and functioning of adaptive immunity. Growing evidence also suggests multiple roles for BTK in mononuclear cells of the innate immune system, especially in dendritic cells and macrophages. For example, BTK has been shown to function in Toll-like receptor-mediated recognition of infectious agents, cellular maturation and recruitment processes, and Fc receptor signaling. Most recently, BTK was additionally identified as a direct regulator of a key innate inflammatory machinery, the NLRP3 inflammasome. BTK has thus attracted interest not only for gaining a more thorough basic understanding of the human innate immune system but also as a target to therapeutically modulate innate immunity. We here review the latest developments on the role of BTK in mononuclear innate immune cells in mouse versus man, with specific emphasis on the sensing of infectious agents and the induction of inflammation. Therapeutic implications for modulating innate immunity and critical open questions are also discussed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 193 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 193 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 16%
Researcher 28 15%
Student > Bachelor 22 11%
Student > Master 16 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 5%
Other 29 15%
Unknown 57 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 36 19%
Immunology and Microbiology 27 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 24 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 4%
Other 26 13%
Unknown 59 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 December 2022.
All research outputs
#1,832,869
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#1,688
of 31,537 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,419
of 342,685 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#37
of 619 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,537 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,685 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 619 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.