↓ Skip to main content

Metabolic Adaptation of Human CD4+ and CD8+ T-Cells to T-Cell Receptor-Mediated Stimulation

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in immunology, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
15 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
69 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
138 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Metabolic Adaptation of Human CD4+ and CD8+ T-Cells to T-Cell Receptor-Mediated Stimulation
Published in
Frontiers in immunology, November 2017
DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2017.01516
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicholas Jones, James G. Cronin, Garry Dolton, Silvia Panetti, Andrea J. Schauenburg, Sarah A. E. Galloway, Andrew K. Sewell, David K. Cole, Catherine A. Thornton, Nigel J. Francis

Abstract

Linking immunometabolic adaptation to T-cell function provides insight for the development of new therapeutic approaches in multiple disease settings. T-cell activation and downstream effector functions of CD4(+) and CD8(+) T-cells are controlled by the strength of interaction between the T-cell receptor (TCR) and peptides presented by human leukocyte antigens (pHLA). The role of TCR-pHLA interactions in modulating T-cell metabolism is unknown. Here, for the first time, we explore the relative contributions of the main metabolic pathways to functional responses in human CD4(+) and CD8(+) T-cells. Increased expression of hexokinase II accompanied by higher basal glycolysis is demonstrated in CD4(+) T-cells; cytokine production in CD8(+) T-cells is more reliant on oxidative phosphorylation. Using antigen-specific CD4(+) and CD8(+) T-cell clones and altered peptide ligands, we demonstrate that binding affinity tunes the underlying metabolic shift. Overall, this study provides important new insight into how metabolic pathways are controlled during antigen-specific activation of human T-cells.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 138 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 138 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 20%
Researcher 23 17%
Student > Bachelor 17 12%
Student > Master 15 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 8%
Other 16 12%
Unknown 28 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Immunology and Microbiology 38 28%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 28 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 9%
Neuroscience 3 2%
Other 12 9%
Unknown 31 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 January 2024.
All research outputs
#4,690,268
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#5,073
of 31,537 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,247
of 342,671 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#117
of 619 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,537 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,671 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 619 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.