↓ Skip to main content

How B-Cell Receptor Repertoire Sequencing Can Be Enriched with Structural Antibody Data

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in immunology, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
17 X users

Readers on

mendeley
218 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
How B-Cell Receptor Repertoire Sequencing Can Be Enriched with Structural Antibody Data
Published in
Frontiers in immunology, December 2017
DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2017.01753
Pubmed ID
Authors

Aleksandr Kovaltsuk, Konrad Krawczyk, Jacob D. Galson, Dominic F. Kelly, Charlotte M. Deane, Johannes Trück

Abstract

Next-generation sequencing of immunoglobulin gene repertoires (Ig-seq) allows the investigation of large-scale antibody dynamics at a sequence level. However, structural information, a crucial descriptor of antibody binding capability, is not collected in Ig-seq protocols. Developing systematic relationships between the antibody sequence information gathered from Ig-seq and low-throughput techniques such as X-ray crystallography could radically improve our understanding of antibodies. The mapping of Ig-seq datasets to known antibody structures can indicate structurally, and perhaps functionally, uncharted areas. Furthermore, contrasting naïve and antigenically challenged datasets using structural antibody descriptors should provide insights into antibody maturation. As the number of antibody structures steadily increases and more and more Ig-seq datasets become available, the opportunities that arise from combining the two types of information increase as well. Here, we review how these data types enrich one another and show potential for advancing our knowledge of the immune system and improving antibody engineering.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 218 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 218 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 43 20%
Researcher 40 18%
Student > Bachelor 17 8%
Student > Master 16 7%
Other 12 6%
Other 33 15%
Unknown 57 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 47 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 38 17%
Immunology and Microbiology 36 17%
Chemistry 9 4%
Engineering 5 2%
Other 20 9%
Unknown 63 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 June 2019.
All research outputs
#4,083,782
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#4,327
of 31,537 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,223
of 445,594 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#106
of 591 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,537 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 445,594 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 591 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.