You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
MicroRNA-155—at the Critical Interface of Innate and Adaptive Immunity in Arthritis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in immunology, January 2018
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fimmu.2017.01932 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Stefano Alivernini, Elisa Gremese, Charles McSharry, Barbara Tolusso, Gianfranco Ferraccioli, Iain B. McInnes, Mariola Kurowska-Stolarska |
| Abstract |
MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are small non-coding RNAs that fine-tune the cell response to a changing environment by modulating the cell transcriptome. miR-155 is a multifunctional miRNA enriched in cells of the immune system and is indispensable for the immune response. However, when deregulated, miR-155 contributes to the development of chronic inflammation, autoimmunity, cancer, and fibrosis. Herein, we review the evidence for the pathogenic role of miR-155 in driving aberrant activation of the immune system in rheumatoid arthritis, and its potential as a disease biomarker and therapeutic target. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 14% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 7% |
| Canada | 1 | 7% |
| Benin | 1 | 7% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 8 | 57% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 71% |
| Scientists | 3 | 21% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 189 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 189 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 35 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 23 | 12% |
| Researcher | 20 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 5% |
| Other | 31 | 16% |
| Unknown | 55 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 40 | 21% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 23 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 8% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 23 | 12% |
| Unknown | 60 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 August 2019.
All research outputs
#3,134,416
of 25,732,188 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#3,310
of 32,274 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,259
of 451,933 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#91
of 613 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,732,188 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,274 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 451,933 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 613 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.