↓ Skip to main content

Genetic Regulation of Guanylate-Binding Proteins 2b and 5 during Leishmaniasis in Mice

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in immunology, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Genetic Regulation of Guanylate-Binding Proteins 2b and 5 during Leishmaniasis in Mice
Published in
Frontiers in immunology, February 2018
DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2018.00130
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yahya Sohrabi, Valeryia Volkova, Tatyana Kobets, Helena Havelková, Imtissal Krayem, Martina Slapničková, Peter Demant, Marie Lipoldová

Abstract

Interferon-induced GTPases [guanylate-binding proteins (GBPs)] play an important role in inflammasome activation and mediate innate resistance to many intracellular pathogens, but little is known about their role in leishmaniasis. We therefore studied expression ofGbp2b/Gbp1andGbp5mRNA in skin, inguinal lymph nodes, spleen, and liver afterLeishmania majorinfection and in uninfected controls. We used two different groups of related mouse strains: BALB/c, STS, and CcS-5, CcS-16, and CcS-20 that carry different combinations of BALB/c and STS genomes, and strains O20, C57BL/10 (B10) and B10.O20, OcB-9, and OcB-43 carrying different combinations of O20 and B10 genomes. The strains were classified on the basis of size and number of infection-induced skin lesions as highly susceptible (BALB/c, CcS-16), susceptible (B10.O20), intermediate (CcS-20), and resistant (STS, O20, B10, OcB-9, OcB-43). Some uninfected strains differed in expression ofGbp2b/Gbp1andGbp5, especially ofGbp2b/Gbp1in skin. Uninfected BALB/c and STS did not differ in their expression, but in CcS-5, CcS-16, and CcS-20, which all carry BALB/c-derivedGbpgene-cluster, expression ofGbp2b/Gbp1exceeds that of both parents. These data indicatetrans-regulation ofGbps. Infection resulted in approximately 10× upregulation ofGbp2b/Gbp1andGbp5mRNAs in organs of both susceptible and resistant strains, which was most pronounced in skin. CcS-20 expressed higher level ofGbp2b/Gbp1than both parental strains in skin, whereas CcS-16 expressed higher level ofGbp2b/Gbp1than both parental strains in skin and liver. This indicates atrans-regulation present in infected mice CcS-16 and CcS-20. Immunostaining of skin of five strains revealed in resistant and intermediate strains STS, CcS-5, O20, and CcS-20 tight co-localization of Gbp2b/Gbp1 protein with mostL. majorparasites, whereas in the highly susceptible strain, BALB/c most parasites did not associate with Gbp2b/Gbp1. In conclusion, expression ofGbp2b/Gbp1andGbp5was increased even in organs of clinically asymptomatic resistant mice. It suggests a hidden inflammation, which might contribute to control of persisting parasites. This is supported by the co-localization of Gbpb2/Gbp1 protein andL. majorparasites in skin of resistant and intermediate but not highly susceptible mice.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 10%
Student > Bachelor 3 10%
Student > Master 3 10%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 9 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 26%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 10%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 10 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 February 2018.
All research outputs
#20,663,600
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#24,755
of 31,537 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#341,285
of 446,427 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#531
of 627 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,537 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,427 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 627 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.