↓ Skip to main content

Computational Strategies for Dissecting the High-Dimensional Complexity of Adaptive Immune Repertoires

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in immunology, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
45 X users
patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
170 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
352 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Computational Strategies for Dissecting the High-Dimensional Complexity of Adaptive Immune Repertoires
Published in
Frontiers in immunology, February 2018
DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2018.00224
Pubmed ID
Authors

Enkelejda Miho, Alexander Yermanos, Cédric R. Weber, Christoph T. Berger, Sai T. Reddy, Victor Greiff

Abstract

The adaptive immune system recognizes antigensviaan immense array of antigen-binding antibodies and T-cell receptors, the immune repertoire. The interrogation of immune repertoires is of high relevance for understanding the adaptive immune response in disease and infection (e.g., autoimmunity, cancer, HIV). Adaptive immune receptor repertoire sequencing (AIRR-seq) has driven the quantitative and molecular-level profiling of immune repertoires, thereby revealing the high-dimensional complexity of the immune receptor sequence landscape. Several methods for the computational and statistical analysis of large-scale AIRR-seq data have been developed to resolve immune repertoire complexity and to understand the dynamics of adaptive immunity. Here, we review the current research on (i) diversity, (ii) clustering and network, (iii) phylogenetic, and (iv) machine learning methods applied to dissect, quantify, and compare the architecture, evolution, and specificity of immune repertoires. We summarize outstanding questions in computational immunology and propose future directions for systems immunology toward coupling AIRR-seq with the computational discovery of immunotherapeutics, vaccines, and immunodiagnostics.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 45 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 352 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 352 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 76 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 69 20%
Student > Master 39 11%
Student > Bachelor 29 8%
Other 26 7%
Other 34 10%
Unknown 79 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 96 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 59 17%
Immunology and Microbiology 36 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 4%
Computer Science 13 4%
Other 41 12%
Unknown 94 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2022.
All research outputs
#1,285,069
of 25,508,813 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#1,115
of 31,866 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,240
of 344,673 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#25
of 683 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,508,813 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,866 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,673 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 683 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.