You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Metabolic Modulation in Macrophage Effector Function
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in immunology, February 2018
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fimmu.2018.00270 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ciana Diskin, Eva M. Pålsson-McDermott |
| Abstract |
Traditionally cellular respiration or metabolism has been viewed as catabolic and anabolic pathways generating energy and biosynthetic precursors required for growth and general cellular maintenance. However, growing literature provides evidence of a much broader role for metabolic reactions and processes in controlling immunological effector functions. Much of this research into immunometabolism has focused on macrophages, cells that are central in pro- as well as anti-inflammatory responses-responses that in turn are a direct result of metabolic reprogramming. As we learn more about the precise role of metabolic pathways and pathway intermediates in immune function, a novel opportunity to target immunometabolism therapeutically has emerged. Here, we review the current understanding of the regulation of macrophage function through metabolic remodeling. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 21% |
| Spain | 2 | 11% |
| Benin | 1 | 5% |
| France | 1 | 5% |
| Ireland | 1 | 5% |
| Singapore | 1 | 5% |
| Italy | 1 | 5% |
| Canada | 1 | 5% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 6 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 58% |
| Scientists | 8 | 42% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 357 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 357 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 83 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 47 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 45 | 13% |
| Researcher | 43 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 27 | 8% |
| Other | 35 | 10% |
| Unknown | 77 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Immunology and Microbiology | 83 | 23% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 69 | 19% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 34 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 33 | 9% |
| Neuroscience | 7 | 2% |
| Other | 40 | 11% |
| Unknown | 91 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2018.
All research outputs
#3,375,037
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#3,720
of 31,537 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,614
of 344,213 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#121
of 694 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,537 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,213 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 694 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.