↓ Skip to main content

Functional, Antigen-Specific Stem Cell Memory (TSCM) CD4+ T Cells Are Induced by Human Mycobacterium tuberculosis Infection

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in immunology, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Functional, Antigen-Specific Stem Cell Memory (TSCM) CD4+ T Cells Are Induced by Human Mycobacterium tuberculosis Infection
Published in
Frontiers in immunology, March 2018
DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2018.00324
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cheleka A. M. Mpande, One B. Dintwe, Munyaradzi Musvosvi, Simbarashe Mabwe, Nicole Bilek, Mark Hatherill, Elisa Nemes, Thomas J. Scriba, The SATVI Clinical Immunology Team, Cynthia Ontong, Elizabeth Filander, Fadia Alexander, Hadn Africa, Janelle Botes, Lebohang Makhethe, Lungisa Jaxa, Marcia Steyn, Noncedo Xoyana, Rachel Oelfose, Sindile Matiwane

Abstract

Maintenance of long-lasting immunity is thought to depend on stem cell memory T cells (TSCM), which have superior self-renewing capacity, longevity and proliferative potential compared with central memory (TCM) or effector (TEFF) T cells. Our knowledge of TSCMderives primarily from studies of virus-specific CD8+TSCM. We aimed to determine if infection withMycobacterium tuberculosis(M. tb), the etiological agent of tuberculosis, generates antigen-specific CD4+TSCMand to characterize their functional ontology. We studied T cell responses to naturalM. tbinfection in a longitudinal adolescent cohort of recent QuantiFERON-TB Gold (QFT) converters and three cross-sectional QFT+adult cohorts; and to bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) vaccination in infants.M. tband/or BCG-specific CD4 T cells were detected by flow cytometry using major histocompatibility complex class II tetramers bearing Ag85, CFP-10, or ESAT-6 peptides, or by intracellular cytokine staining. Transcriptomic analyses ofM. tb-specific tetramer+CD4+TSCM(CD45RA+CCR7+CD27+) were performed by microfluidic qRT-PCR, and functional and phenotypic characteristics were confirmed by measuring expression of chemokine receptors, cytotoxic molecules and cytokines using flow cytometry. M. tb -specific TSCMwere not detected in QFT-negative persons. After QFT conversion frequencies of TSCMincreased to measurable levels and remained detectable thereafter, suggesting that primaryM. tbinfection induces TSCMcells. Gene expression (GE) profiling of tetramer+TSCMshowed that these cells were distinct from bulk CD4+naïve T cells (TN) and shared features of bulk TSCMandM. tb-specific tetramer+TCMand TEFFcells. These TSCMwere predominantly CD95+and CXCR3+, markers typical of CD8+TSCM. Tetramer+TSCMexpressed significantly higher protein levels of CCR5, CCR6, CXCR3, granzyme A, granzyme K, and granulysin than bulk TNand TSCMcells.M. tb-specific TSCMwere also functional, producing IL-2, IFN-γ, and TNF-α upon antigen stimulation, and their frequencies correlated positively with long-term BCG-specific CD4+T cell proliferative potential after infant vaccination. Human infection withM. tbinduced distinct, antigen-specific CD4+TSCMcells endowed with effector functions, including expression of cytotoxic molecules and Th1 cytokines, and displayed chemokine receptor profiles consistent with memory Th1/17 cells. Induction of CD4+TSCMshould be considered for vaccination approaches that aim to generate long-lived memory T cells againstM. tb.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 77 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 18%
Student > Master 14 18%
Researcher 9 12%
Student > Bachelor 5 6%
Student > Postgraduate 5 6%
Other 9 12%
Unknown 21 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Immunology and Microbiology 17 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 4%
Other 9 12%
Unknown 25 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 March 2018.
All research outputs
#22,905,350
of 25,540,105 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#27,745
of 31,935 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#305,733
of 345,277 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#632
of 689 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,540,105 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,935 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,277 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 689 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.