↓ Skip to main content

A Framework for Understanding the Evasion of Host Immunity by Candida Biofilms

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in immunology, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
14 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Framework for Understanding the Evasion of Host Immunity by Candida Biofilms
Published in
Frontiers in immunology, March 2018
DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2018.00538
Pubmed ID
Authors

Josselyn E. Garcia-Perez, Lotte Mathé, Stephanie Humblet-Baron, Annabel Braem, Katrien Lagrou, Patrick Van Dijck, Adrian Liston

Abstract

Candida biofilms are a major cause of nosocomial morbidity and mortality. The mechanism by whichCandidabiofilms evade the immune system remains unknown. In this perspective, we develop a theoretical framework of the three, not mutually exclusive, models, which could explain biofilm evasion of host immunity. First, biofilms may exhibit properties of immunological silence, preventing immune activation. Second, biofilms may produce immune-deviating factors, converting effective immunity into ineffective immunity. Third, biofilms may resist host immunity, which would otherwise be effective. Using a murine subcutaneous biofilm model, we found that mice infected with biofilms developed sterilizing immunity effective when challenged with yeast formCandida. Despite the induction of effective anti-Candidaimmunity, no spontaneous clearance of the biofilm was observed. These results support the immune resistance model of biofilm immune evasion and demonstrate an asymmetric relationship between the host and biofilms, with biofilms eliciting effective immune responses yet being resistant to immunological clearance.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 36 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 17%
Student > Bachelor 6 17%
Researcher 4 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Student > Postgraduate 2 6%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 11 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 11%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 8%
Materials Science 2 6%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 13 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 December 2020.
All research outputs
#4,141,197
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#4,419
of 31,537 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#77,606
of 351,776 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#151
of 700 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,537 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,776 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 700 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.