↓ Skip to main content

Disease Evolution and Response to Rapamycin in Activated Phosphoinositide 3-Kinase δ Syndrome: The European Society for Immunodeficiencies-Activated Phosphoinositide 3-Kinase δ Syndrome Registry

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in immunology, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
11 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
152 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
128 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Disease Evolution and Response to Rapamycin in Activated Phosphoinositide 3-Kinase δ Syndrome: The European Society for Immunodeficiencies-Activated Phosphoinositide 3-Kinase δ Syndrome Registry
Published in
Frontiers in immunology, March 2018
DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2018.00543
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maria Elena Maccari, Hassan Abolhassani, Asghar Aghamohammadi, Alessandro Aiuti, Olga Aleinikova, Catherine Bangs, Safa Baris, Federica Barzaghi, Helen Baxendale, Matthew Buckland, Siobhan O. Burns, Caterina Cancrini, Andrew Cant, Pascal Cathébras, Marina Cavazzana, Anita Chandra, Francesca Conti, Tanya Coulter, Lisa A. Devlin, J. David M. Edgar, Saul Faust, Alain Fischer, Marina Garcia Prat, Lennart Hammarström, Maximilian Heeg, Stephen Jolles, Elif Karakoc-Aydiner, Gerhard Kindle, Ayca Kiykim, Dinakantha Kumararatne, Bodo Grimbacher, Hilary Longhurst, Nizar Mahlaoui, Tomas Milota, Fernando Moreira, Despina Moshous, Anna Mukhina, Olaf Neth, Benedicte Neven, Alexandra Nieters, Peter Olbrich, Ahmet Ozen, Jana Pachlopnik Schmid, Capucine Picard, Seraina Prader, William Rae, Janine Reichenbach, Stephan Rusch, Sinisa Savic, Alessia Scarselli, Raphael Scheible, Anna Sediva, Svetlana O. Sharapova, Anna Shcherbina, Mary Slatter, Pere Soler-Palacin, Aurelie Stanislas, Felipe Suarez, Francesca Tucci, Annette Uhlmann, Joris van Montfrans, Klaus Warnatz, Anthony Peter Williams, Phil Wood, Sven Kracker, Alison Mary Condliffe, Stephan Ehl

Abstract

Activated phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) δ Syndrome (APDS), caused by autosomal dominant mutations inPIK3CD(APDS1) orPIK3R1(APDS2), is a heterogeneous primary immunodeficiency. While initial cohort-descriptions summarized the spectrum of clinical and immunological manifestations, questions about long-term disease evolution and response to therapy remain. The prospective European Society for Immunodeficiencies (ESID)-APDS registry aims to characterize the disease course, identify outcome predictors, and evaluate treatment responses. So far, 77 patients have been recruited (51 APDS1, 26 APDS2). Analysis of disease evolution in the first 68 patients pinpoints the early occurrence of recurrent respiratory infections followed by chronic lymphoproliferation, gastrointestinal manifestations, and cytopenias. Although most manifestations occur by age 15, adult-onset and asymptomatic courses were documented. Bronchiectasis was observed in 24/40 APDS1 patients who received a CT-scan compared with 4/15 APDS2 patients. By age 20, half of the patients had received at least one immunosuppressant, but 2-3 lines of immunosuppressive therapy were not unusual before age 10. Response to rapamycin was rated by physician visual analog scale as good in 10, moderate in 9, and poor in 7. Lymphoproliferation showed the best response (8 complete, 11 partial, 6 no remission), while bowel inflammation (3 complete, 3 partial, 9 no remission) and cytopenia (3 complete, 2 partial, 9 no remission) responded less well. Hence, non-lymphoproliferative manifestations should be a key target for novel therapies. This report from the ESID-APDS registry provides comprehensive baseline documentation for a growing cohort that will be followed prospectively to establish prognostic factors and identify patients for treatment studies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 128 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 128 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 15 12%
Researcher 14 11%
Student > Bachelor 12 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 9%
Professor 9 7%
Other 21 16%
Unknown 45 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 25%
Immunology and Microbiology 20 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 2%
Other 10 8%
Unknown 53 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 December 2020.
All research outputs
#3,795,315
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#4,275
of 31,696 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,897
of 351,981 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#144
of 700 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,696 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,981 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 700 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.