↓ Skip to main content

Gender Bias in Human Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Problem of Steroid Receptor Action?

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in immunology, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (60th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Gender Bias in Human Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Problem of Steroid Receptor Action?
Published in
Frontiers in immunology, March 2018
DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2018.00611
Pubmed ID
Authors

Virginia Rider, Nabih I. Abdou, Bruce F. Kimler, Nanyan Lu, Susan Brown, Brooke L. Fridley

Abstract

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic systemic autoimmune disease resulting from abnormal interactions between T and B cells. The acquisition of SLE is linked to genetic susceptibility, and diverse environmental agents can trigger disease onset in genetically susceptible individuals. However, the strongest risk factor for developing SLE is being female (9:1 female to male ratio). The female sex steroid, estradiol, working through its receptors, contributes to the gender bias in SLE although the mechanisms remain enigmatic. In a small clinical trial, monthly administration of the estrogen receptor (ERα) antagonist, ICI182,780 (fulvestrant), significantly reduced disease indicators in SLE patients. In order to identify changes that could account for improved disease status, the present study utilized fulvestrant (Faslodex) to block ERα action in cultured SLE T cells that were purified from blood samples collected from SLE patients (n = 18, median age 42 years) and healthy control females (n = 25, median age 46 years). The effects of ERα antagonism on estradiol-dependent gene expression and canonical signaling pathways were analyzed. Pathways that were significantly altered by addition of Faslodex included T helper (Th) cell differentiation, steroid receptor signaling [glucocorticoid receptor (GR), ESR1 (ERα)], ubiquitination, and sumoylation pathways. ERα protein expression was significantly lower (p < 0.018) in freshly isolated, resting SLE T cells suggesting ERα turnover is inherently faster in SLE T cells. In contrast, ERα/ERβ mRNA and ERβ protein levels were not significantly different between SLE and normal control T cell samples. Plasma estradiol levels did not differ (p > 0.05) between SLE patients and controls. A previously undetected interaction between GR and ERα signaling pathways suggests posttranslational modification of steroid receptors in SLE T cells may alter ERα/GR actions and contribute to the strong gender bias of this autoimmune disorder.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 81 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 10 12%
Student > Master 8 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 10%
Researcher 6 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 7%
Other 8 10%
Unknown 35 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 11%
Immunology and Microbiology 8 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 5%
Other 11 14%
Unknown 38 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 May 2018.
All research outputs
#8,264,793
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#10,116
of 31,537 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#134,675
of 344,304 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#307
of 697 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,537 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,304 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 697 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.